英文字典中文字典


英文字典中文字典51ZiDian.com



中文字典辞典   英文字典 a   b   c   d   e   f   g   h   i   j   k   l   m   n   o   p   q   r   s   t   u   v   w   x   y   z       







请输入英文单字，中文词皆可：

voidable    
a. 可使无效的,得撤销的

可使无效的,得撤销的

voidable
adj 1: capable of being rescinded or voided; "the judgment was
rescindable"; "voidable contracts" [synonym: {rescindable},
{voidable}]

Voidable \Void"a*ble\, a.
1. Capable of being voided, or evacuated.
[1913 Webster]

2. (Law) Capable of being avoided, or of being adjudged void,
invalid, and of no force; capable of being either avoided
or confirmed.
[1913 Webster]

If the metropolitan . . . grants letters of
administration, such administration is not, but
voidable by sentence. --Ayliffe.
[1913 Webster]

Note: A voidable contract may be ratified and confirmed; to
render it null and of no effect, it must be avoided; a
void contract can not be ratified.
[1913 Webster]

VOIDABLE. That which has some force or effect, but which, in consequence of
some inherent quality, may be legally annulled or avoided.
2. As a familiar example, may be mentioned the case of a contract, made
by an infant with an adult, which maybe avoided or confirmed by the former
on his coining of age. Vide Parties, contracts.
3. Such contracts are generally of binding force until avoided by the
party having a right to annul them. Bac. Ab. Infancy, 1 3; Com. Dig. Enfant;
Fonb. Eq. b. 1, c. 2, Sec. 4, note b; 3 Burr. 1794 Nels. Ch. R. 5 5; 1 Atk.
3 5 4; Str. 9 3 7; Perk. Sec. 12. VOIR. An old French word, which signifies
the same as the modern word vrai, true. Voir dire, to speak truly, to tell
the truth.
2. When a witness is supposed to have an interest in the cause, the
party against whom he is called has the choice to prove such interest by
calling another witness to that fact, or be may require the witness produced
to be sworn on his voir dire as to whether he has an interest in the cause,
or not, but the party against whom he is called will not be allowed to have
recourse to both methods to prove the witness interest. If the witness
answers he has no interest, he is competent, his oath being conclusive; if
he swears he has an interest, he will be rejected.
3. Though this is the rule established beyond the power of the courts
to change, it seems not very satisfactory. The witness is sworn on his voir
dire to ascertain whether he has an interest, which would disqualify him,
because he would be tempted to perjure himself, if he testified when
interested. But when he is asked whether he has such an interest, if he is
dishonest and anxious to be sworn in the case, he will swear falsely he has
none, and his answer being conclusive, he will be admitted as competent; if,
on the contrary, he swears truly he has an interest, when he knows that will
exclude him, he is told that for being thus honest, he must be rejected.
See, generally, 12 Vin. Ab. 48; 22 Vin. Ab. 14; 1 Dall, 375; Dane's Ab.
Index, h.t.; and Interest.


请选择你想看的字典辞典：
单词字典翻译
voidable查看　voidable　在百度字典中的解释百度英翻中〔查看〕
voidable查看　voidable　在Google字典中的解释Google英翻中〔查看〕
voidable查看　voidable　在Yahoo字典中的解释Yahoo英翻中〔查看〕

安装中文字典英文字典查询工具!


中文字典英文字典工具:
选择颜色:
输入中英文单字

































































英文字典中文字典相关资料:


  • When 0 is multiplied with infinity, what is the result?
    What I would say is that you can multiply any non-zero number by infinity and get either infinity or negative infinity as long as it isn't used in any mathematical proof Because multiplying by infinity is the equivalent of dividing by 0 When you allow things like that in proofs you end up with nonsense like 1 = 0 Multiplying 0 by infinity is the equivalent of 0 0 which is undefined
  • What is mathematical basis for the percent symbol (%)?
    It's a convention that started sort of as a fluke In a 14th century Italian manuscript, a sideways letter P is written to stand for 'per 100' or 'per cento' It then slowly evolved A more in depth bit can be found under the percent sign history here, and on the wiki page In addition to percent 0 0, and permil 0 00, there is also permyriad 0 000 for 1 10000
  • complex analysis - Show that the function $f (z) = \log (z-i)$ is . . .
    Ok but the result ends up being the same, $u_ {xx} + u_ {yy}$ is never becoming zero since it is $\frac {x+y-1} {\sqrt {x^2 + (y-1)^2}}$
  • What were Jacques Derridas most important ideas?
    See a helpful survey in SEP, Jacques Derrida His most recognizable trademark idea is deconstruction, which upends settled lines of thought by tracing their contingent genealogy and or argumentative structure to expose biases, shaky presuppositions, paradoxes, etc
  • factorial - Why does 0! = 1? - Mathematics Stack Exchange
    The theorem that $\binom {n} {k} = \frac {n!} {k! (n-k)!}$ already assumes $0!$ is defined to be $1$ Otherwise this would be restricted to $0 <k < n$ A reason that we do define $0!$ to be $1$ is so that we can cover those edge cases with the same formula, instead of having to treat them separately We treat binomial coefficients like $\binom {5} {6}$ separately already; the theorem assumes
  • Who first defined truth as adæquatio rei et intellectus?
    António Manuel Martins claims (@44:41 of his lecture quot;Fonseca on Signs quot;) that the origin of what is now called the correspondence theory of truth, Veritas est adæquatio rei et intellectus
  • Prove this proposition is a tautology: [(p ∨ q) ∧ (p → r) ∧ (q → r)] → . . .
    Any help is greatly appreciated [(p ∨ q) ∧ (p → r) ∧ (q → r)] → r ≡ ¬[(p ∨ q) ∧ (¬p ∨ r) ∧ (¬q ∨ r)] ∨ r ≡ ¬(p ∨ q) ∨ ¬(¬p ∨ r
  • trigonometry - Why are angles in degrees converted into degrees . . .
    As an example, I downloaded some GPS data from my camera the other day in which I found numbers like $4215 983 $ This turned out to represent $42$ degrees and $15 983$ minutes If you go to a particular latitude and longitude on Google Maps it will show the latitude and longitude both in degrees with a decimal fraction and also in degrees, minutes, and seconds with a decimal fraction
  • Prove by induction that $n! gt;2^n$ - Mathematics Stack Exchange
    Hint: prove inductively that a product is $> 1$ if each factor is $>1$ Apply that to the product $$\frac {n!} {2^n}\: =\: \frac {4!} {2^4} \frac {5}2 \frac {6}2 \frac {7}2\: \cdots\:\frac {n}2$$ This is a prototypical example of a proof employing multiplicative telescopy Notice how much simpler the proof becomes after transforming into a form where the induction is obvious, namely: $\:$ a





中文字典-英文字典  2005-2009