英文字典中文字典


英文字典中文字典51ZiDian.com



中文字典辞典   英文字典 a   b   c   d   e   f   g   h   i   j   k   l   m   n   o   p   q   r   s   t   u   v   w   x   y   z       







请输入英文单字，中文词皆可：


请选择你想看的字典辞典：
单词字典翻译
espurge查看　espurge　在百度字典中的解释百度英翻中〔查看〕
espurge查看　espurge　在Google字典中的解释Google英翻中〔查看〕
espurge查看　espurge　在Yahoo字典中的解释Yahoo英翻中〔查看〕

安装中文字典英文字典查询工具!


中文字典英文字典工具:
选择颜色:
输入中英文单字

































































英文字典中文字典相关资料:


  • Miranda v. Arizona | Constitution Center
    Miranda’s oral and written confessions are now held inadmissible under the Court’s new rules One is entitled to feel astonished that the Constitution can be read to produce this result
  • Facts and Case Summary - Miranda v. Arizona - United States Courts
    In this case, the Supreme Court was asked to decide if the age of a juvenile being questioned by police should be taken into consideration when deciding if he or she is in police custody and, therefore, entitled to a Miranda warning
  • Miranda v. Arizona - Wikipedia
    Because of the defendant's low I Q and poor English-language skills, the U S Court of Appeals ruled that it was a "clear error" when the district court found that Garibay had "knowingly and intelligently waived his Miranda rights "
  • Miranda v. Arizona Case Summary: Ruling and Rights
    Miranda v Arizona established the requirement that police must inform suspects of their constitutional rights before questioning them in custody The Supreme Court decided the case on June 13, 1966, in a closely divided 5–4 ruling that reshaped criminal procedure across the country 1 The decision created what most people now recognize simply as “Miranda rights,” and its influence
  • Miranda v. Arizona | Definition, Background, Facts | Britannica
    Arizona reversed an Arizona court’s conviction of Ernesto Miranda on charges of kidnapping and rape
  • Overview - Miranda v. Arizona: The Rights to Justice (March 13, 1963 . . .
    The decision that gave rise to the Miranda warning and the verb “Mirandize” was preserved in the U S law that followed the Supreme Court’s ruling, which found that the Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights of Ernesto Arturo Miranda were violated at the moment of his arrest and trial
  • Miranda v. Arizona - Landmark Cases of the US Supreme Court
    Ernesto Miranda was arrested after a victim identified him as her assailant The police officers who questioned him did not inform him of his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination or of his Sixth Amendment right to the assistance of an attorney
  • Miranda Rights Supreme Court Cases
    Miranda Rights Supreme Court Cases The Fifth Amendment to the U S Constitution protects people suspected of crimes from self-incrimination In Miranda v Arizona, the Supreme Court applied this principle to the context of police questioning
  • Miranda v. Arizona and Its Impact on Criminal Justice | LawHub
    All that changed with the 1966 U S Supreme Court decision Miranda v Arizona — a landmark case that fundamentally shaped American criminal procedure and significantly advanced civil rights At its core, the case centered around Ernesto Miranda, a man arrested in Phoenix, Arizona, for kidnapping and rape
  • Miranda v. Arizona (1966): Supreme Court Case That Created the Miranda . . .
    In a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Miranda, establishing that the prosecution could not use statements from custodial interrogation unless procedural safeguards were in place





中文字典-英文字典  2005-2009