英文字典中文字典


英文字典中文字典51ZiDian.com



中文字典辞典   英文字典 a   b   c   d   e   f   g   h   i   j   k   l   m   n   o   p   q   r   s   t   u   v   w   x   y   z       







请输入英文单字，中文词皆可：


请选择你想看的字典辞典：
单词字典翻译
792674查看　792674　在百度字典中的解释百度英翻中〔查看〕
792674查看　792674　在Google字典中的解释Google英翻中〔查看〕
792674查看　792674　在Yahoo字典中的解释Yahoo英翻中〔查看〕

安装中文字典英文字典查询工具!


中文字典英文字典工具:
选择颜色:
输入中英文单字

































































英文字典中文字典相关资料:


  • Bihun v. AT T Information Systems, Inc. (1993) - Justia Law
    Ms Bihun worked for defendant or one of its predecessors from 1977 to 1985 Bihun became an area personnel manager in 1983 Her immediate supervisor was Ms Jimetta Moore, the district personnel manager Ms Bihun received a "number one" staff rating and was eligible for promotion to the next level of management in January 1984
  • Bihun v. AT T Information Systems, Inc. (Bihun v. AT T . . . - vLex
    The case went to the jury on Ms Bihun's claims of sexual harassment and subsequent retaliation for complaining about the harassment in violation of California's Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) 1 The jury awarded Ms Bihun compensatory damages of $1 5 million and $500,000 in punitive damages
  • BIHUN v. AT T INFORMATI | 13 Cal. App. . . | p4th9761946 - Leagle
    Defendant, AT T Information Systems, appeals from a judgment in favor of Oksana Bihun, a former employee, in her suit for damages arising from sexual harassment by one of defendant's senior officials
  • OKSANA R. BIHUN, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. AT T INFORMATION SYSTEMS . . .
    There was sufficient evidence that plaintiff would continue to experience emotional distress in the future The award of compensatory damages was not excessive The lower court did not abuse its discretion in awarding attorney fees at the rate of $ 450 per hour for plaintiff's counsel
  • No. B053181 - Resolving Discovery Disputes
    In reviewing the trial court's exercise of that broad discretion, an appellate court is not authorized to substitute its judgment for that of the trial court Therefore, a difference of opinion is not a ground for reversal
  • FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW - mpgallagherlaw. com
    OKSANA R BIHUN, Plaintiff and Respondent, v AT T INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC , Defendant and Appellant An employee sued her former employer for damages arising from sexual harassment, after she was subjected to unwelcome sexual advances by one of the employer's senior officials
  • I N V I T A T I O N T O C O M M E N T - California Courts
    v Code, §§ 12923, 12940(j)) [Name of plaintiff] claims that [he she] was subjected to harassment based on [his her] [describe protected status, e g , race, gender, or age] at [name of defendant], causing a hosti
  • “Me too” and “not me too” evidence in employment litigation
    “Me too” evidence is evidence that shows an employer discriminated against similarly situated individuals other than the plaintiff It shows a pattern or practice of discrimination against persons in plaintiff’s protected class (Spulak v
  • Google
    Search the world's information, including webpages, images, videos and more Google has many special features to help you find exactly what you're looking for





中文字典-英文字典  2005-2009